When the state of our political discourse appears to be
“Your guy is more corrupt than our guy”,
I can’t help but wonder how we got this way. I believe the “Media” in all its’ forms have
caused much of our angst. The effort to
capture readers with their attendant profits has lead to; misleading headlines,
opinions appearing as news items (often on the front page), pictures that don’t have to do with the
action being cited, (usually unflattering), as well as making the impossible
seem a realistic goal (taking away guns or eliminating abortion). One of the worst things the media does is to
name the deranged shooters that continue to crop up. We have no need to know their names and the
only result that comes from publishing the names is to glorify the idiot that
picks up a gun because he can’t get attention any other way. I can’t help but wonder how many mass
shootings wouldn’t have occurred if the shooter knew they would only be
referred to as negative adjectives.
Putting dates on photos, as well as statements as to whether or not they
have been altered would also do a lot to let us know what is fake and what is
not. Fear and anger lead to hate and all
three leave reason in the dust. I can
only hope the media will take some responsibility to tamp down the hate that
permeates our society.
Monday, April 30, 2018
Sunday, January 21, 2018
We all lose when there are "winners"
Watching the Vikings win Sunday night made me realize that
our political process has transformed itself into an athletic contest. Our
parties have adopted an attitude of “win at all costs” and “If you’re not with
us on everything, you are against us”. I
am reminded of sailboat racing where the designer will make a boat go one knot
slower because that will make the handicap two knots slower thus winning on
corrected time. It’s called “designing to the rule”, and it’s exactly what our
politicians have become very good at.
It’s common knowledge
that our representatives vote on measures they haven’t read and many couldn’t
understand if they did read. We have
become so obsessed with “winning” and “losing” that we have forgotten that
synergy in interactions can lead to gains for both parties. We are told that business transactions have
winners and losers. In my experience
deals don’t get done when there are losers.
If you are going to lose on a transaction you walk away from it prior to
it being done. Both parties have adopted
divide and conquer strategies, when what we really need is a unite and prosper
strategy.
Friday, November 3, 2017
Parties of Hate, Anger and Blame cry for a new party
Our current political parties are both heavily involved with
the spreading of hatred, anger, lies, and personal attacks. The Parties lack of faith in Democracy is
best exemplified by the sources of money running our elections. Money decides the candidates and then we get
to vote for the richest ones. Those that give the money are only concerned
about their own specific issues, that are frequently at odds with those doing
the actual voting
I would suggest a new party embracing the values of honesty,
transparency, personal integrity and compromise. The platform would be flexible
and allow votes on either side of the isle. Issues to hold dear would be:
1.
Acting in the interests of our children and
grandchildren, to not saddle them with huge
amounts of debt in the form of the
deficit and college loans.
2. Actually fixing Social Security and Medicare now before it gets more expensive.
3.
Taking
climate change as a serious matter.
4.
Providing quality health care to everyone, (not
necessarily insurance).
5
Taking campaign contributions only from voters
that have registered and are able to vote for the candidate.
6
Refraining from negative personal attacks on
their opponents. Attacks should
only be on the issues.
7.
Remembering that taxing, spending, and
compromise are what politicians are supposed to do.
8.
Focus on uniting the county by embracing
diversity.
We will only be able to affect change when we stop blaming
others for our situation and accept the responsibility that we are making
matters worse by enjoying the hatred and anger that permeates our society.
Friday, September 29, 2017
The Terrorists have won
It’s becoming more and more obvious to me that the
terrorists have won their game. The
object of most terrorists is to take down a government. Ours hasn’t been a functioning democracy for
some time. Both political parties are so
wrapped up in building and maintaining their power that they have forgotten
what power is supposed to be used for.
Small groups of activists in power in each party are convinced that a
divide and conquer strategy is the best one to use. By spreading fear, hate, anger and blame to the other party they
think they can consolidate their power.
I haven’t voted for a candidate for a long time and I bet you haven’t
either. We vote against the candidate we
think will do the most harm. We have
equated money with power and believe you need one to get the other. We have stopped listening to the “horse’s
mouth” and instead listen to the pundits misinterpretation of what was said. Instead of discussing ideas, we bad mouth
people. One group blindly agrees with
what they are told to believe and another group thinks they know what is right for
everyone and that everyone should agree with them without discussion. We are
told to see things as good or evil with no in-between. We are led to believe that all relationships
fall in the category of winner or loser and the thought that a transaction
could benefit both sides and even result in synergy is not a possibility. We are taught to believe that if the other
party gets its’ way, the country as we know it will implode.
As an old white man who wears a feed hat, I am tired as
being portrayed as a racist, and I am sure that black people are more tired at
being told their lives don’t matter.
When Archie Bunker came on the scene we all thought it was funny when he
said things that people thought but didn’t say out loud. Now it seems people
just want to say the most outrageous things they can to be noticed. People rant
against “political correctness” when it is really just being polite. We used to be taught that “if you can’t say
something good about someone, don’t say anything at all”.
The media has found that using outrageous headlines is what
garners them the most attention and money and have turned to using opinions as
headlines. We are left not knowing what
to believe as we are told that truth has two sides now. Even the most reputational media provides
opinions when they decide to report only the bad things, (or good) that a
politician does. With all the cacophony
going on I would suggest that no one knows what the country wants, and anyone
that says they do is only pushing their own agenda. We no longer provide any importance to a
politicians’ integrity and many even think the best liar makes the best
politician. This championing of mistrust
is perhaps the most harmful aspect of our current climate as all business and
politics require trust for anything good to happen. It’s gotten to the point that when I hear one
party accusing the other of distasteful actions, I know that the accusing party
has already taken part in those same actions.
The names politicians give their bills always seem to describe what the
bill will not do.
The phony stories about
entitlements, income redistribution and takers really gets my craw. I am entitled to many benefits because I have
paid for them! Income redistribution is
seen as awful when the rich are to give to the poor, but the recent past shows
the largest income redistribution in over a hundred years going from the poor
to the rich. Being accused of being a
taker when the accusers are usually promoting tax cuts is the largest
folly. When one politician gets taxes
cut, politicians in other governmental units end up raising taxes in order to
keep the services that government provides.
I would suggest that the tax cutters are the biggest takers in the way
they pass on larger and larger debt to future generations while continuing to
spend. It’s the same story I heard in corporate life: We get some good benefit
now, and when the it hits the fan it won’t be on my watch!
As long as we let the drug, finance, insurance and other fat
cats finance our electoral system we will see no change. It is in their interest to keep everything as
it is. Lawmakers have made it illegal
for Medicare to negotiate drug prices while we are flooded with opiates, Bankers can continue to rip off their clients
without facing jail, and the Federal government will continue to subsidize
health insurance premiums. Meanwhile all
our Congress people stay the same, arguing that government is either the only problem
or the solution to all our problems. Voters
have to realize that when you elect clowns you end up with a circus. We must unite to prosper.
Monday, June 5, 2017
Buggy Whips forever
It looks like the “Buggy Whip” lobby has taken over this
country. Just as the buggy whip
manufacturers put all their effort against the auto industry, the status quo
lobbies have won. Leaving the Paris
accords works for coal and petroleum companies.
Funding the health insurance companies keeps them profitable while they
cry to Congress. It’s been said that if we had today’s healthcare in the 1950’s
we’d have designer iron lungs as a major industry. We have to stop overlooking the lies that our
lobbyists tell, while ranting against the lies the other guys lobbyists are
telling. Hypocrisy seems to be a virtue
in that we all seem to support our politicians that continue to lie and change
positions. It’s ok for me in Minnesota
to influence an election in Montana, but not ok for the Russians to influence
elections in the US. I fail to see the
difference. Each action takes power away
from the voters and gives it to the lobbyists. Until we get campaign finance
reform, I’m afraid we are going to forestall the future and maybe go to a past
of robber barons, rip offs, and pollution. The corruption of power is in how it
spends more time keeping power then using it for the public good.
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Personal Bubbles
As we retreat into our safe bubbles of beliefs and world
views we have to remember that our bubble is relatively small and not as all
encompassing as reflected by our personal media. By portraying the stupidity of those in other
bubbles, our media can make us feel good by denigrating those in other bubbles
without even attempting to see their viewpoint.
We have become a nation that chooses to not accept responsibility but
ready to blame others. We don’t argue
about concepts that can better the
nation, we call each other names and denigrate people. We revel in getting in
other people’s business and telling them what they should do. The only visions that I can identify from
our politicians are that either: we should totally get rid of government, or
that government can solve all our problems.
The view I get from my bubble is that we believe in: “Life, Liberty, and
the Pursuit of Money”.
Of course, I don’t
really know what this country believes, because the media is run by money and each
organization willing to give the money to the media has a special interest in
mind. The media, just like our
politicians, have to be circumspect in how they perform their duties or they
won’t have any money to operate with.
Power comes with money, so it is no surprise that the two largest
campaign donors are the two industries screwing us the most: the
pharmaceutical and insurance industries. It’s always been a political trick to cause
fear among the citizenry. Fear of loss
is one of the greatest motivators known to man.
Pulling this card has become more and more common as we make individuals
(that entered public service to do what they thought was good) into evil
people.
Our politicians don’t have the time to both govern and raise
campaign funds from thousands of donors so they raise funds from special
interests who now “HAVE ACCESS”. This is
all perfectly legal and perfectly corrupt.
As a Nation we are disgusted with Russia’s meddling with our
election. I wonder why there is no
disgust with the calls for all of us non voters to meddle in Georgia’s
and Montana's congressional elections? Shouldn’t the
voters in that district be able to decide for themselves about who is best to
represent them without our interference?
Politically we have become a nation of critics afraid to
innovate or suggest solutions because we know the ‘trolls’ will come down hard
and/or someone will lose money. I will
counter this trend and suggest a solution, that if passed four years ago, could
have left us in a much better place. The
amendment to our Constitution would read:
“Notwithstanding the First Amendment, efforts to influence elections to
public office in the United States and its’ subdivisions shall be limited to
those who are able to vote in said election.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.”
It would have far
reaching consequences and need real grass roots support, as most of our power
brokers will need substantial readjustment of how they operate, and will oppose
it. The only effect that we can be sure
this would have is to return us to a real Democratic Republic.
Thursday, April 13, 2017
Health Insurers are getting rich
Retiring after 45 years of insuring human lives, I am still
amazed to see how the insurance industry has bought and paid for most of our
Congress; Democrat and Republican. AARP
generates over half of its’ revenue from insurance sales and isn’t likely to
harm the industry or represent us. Now
our State government wants to hand over a half a billion dollars in additional
subsidies! The insurance industry has
always relied on being both boring and “complicated” in order to carry out
their scams and it is time to call them on this nonsense. Many conservatives are still saying we don’t
have a mandate for universal coverage in this country, even though, decades ago, all 50 states have
passed laws making the most expensive universal coverage, emergency room care,
mandatory. Private insurance is the
managing of risks through underwriting, spreading of risk, and claims
management. Traditionally, health insurers
divided their business into individual (fully underwritten) and group. With the
introduction of Obamacare the ability to underwrite the individual market went
away, which should have eliminated this differentiation of group and individual
and thus spreading the risk better.
Because the states regulate insurance, and the insurance lobby is very
effective, no one seems to care to force the insurers to price their business
on all the risk that they assume, group and individual.
While the insurers are complaining about their individual
block of business the politicians are freely giving them our money. The top seven health insurers net income for
2016 was over: 17 billion dollars.
|
1. Unitedhealth Group
|
|
|
7,017,000,000
|
|
|
2. Wellpoint Inc. Group (Anthem)
|
|
2,469,800,000
|
||
|
3. Kaiser Foundation Group
|
|
|
3,100,000,000
|
|
|
4. Humana Group
|
|
|
|
614,000,000
|
|
5. Aetna Group
|
|
|
|
2,271,000,000
|
|
6. HCSC Group
|
|
|
|
77,396,000
|
|
7. Cigna Health Group
|
|
|
1,843,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,392,196,000
|
While the insurance lobby was very effective in both writing
and fighting Obamacare, they have lead misinformation campaigns such as: The
government bureaucrat deciding your health care is worse than the insurance
company bureaucrat deciding your healthcare.
Think for a minute, who gets the bonus for denying your claim. Another is that you should be able to buy
coverage that doesn’t cover everything.
Young people aren’t likely to have a problem so why should they pay for
coverage? One because they aren’t likely
to have claims, the coverage is likely to be very inexpensive and two, when the
claim does come in: it’s us taxpayers who are going to pay it. The thought that “private industry” is more
efficient than government doesn’t stand up to scrutiny: Medicare operates on
about 4% of premiums, while private insurers are operating on between 15% and
20% of premiums (it would have been more except for Senator Franken). The very idea of “For Profit Healthcare” is
an oxymoron. You can only increase
profits by: more sick people, more expensive drugs and treatments, less cures,
and more treatments.
If the pursuit of money isn’t taken into account healthcare
is relatively simple. You want to be
able to see the doctor of your choice and your doctor wants to be able to
charge what he/she wants. This can be
easily be done with a single payer system like Medicare, where a schedule of
payments for procedures is set and the more the doctor charges over the
schedule, the less the single payer will pay, leaving the difference up to the
patient or private insurance. Employer
deductions for health insurance, from form 5500, can be the base for the tax that
would pay for the single payer since employers would no longer have that
obligation.
Unfortunately, I see little hope of change happening until
we can limit campaign contributions to those able to vote in the elections. The corruption of our political process is
getting worse and until we can weed out the money from outside our
constituencies, (including Russia) it isn’t likely to improve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)